Saturday, February 20, 2010

Wayne and Grant as Men of Genre


When analyzing Simon & Schuster’s John Wayne’s America and Steven Cohan’s Masked Men: Masculinity and the Movies in the Fifties, we see two very contrasting images of a “real” man. Wayne is invincible: he represents “America” as a concept, his rugged handsomeness relating directly to the unconquered frontier. In his films, he did not stand for the social and national fears or problems of his audience, “He stood for an America people felt was disappearing or had disappeared, for a time ‘when men were men.’” Grant, however, was a different story. Though he was still dubbed “an authentic American hero,” his persona was not one of invincibility – rather, he portrayed many of the insecurities and instabilities of “manhood” the society of the 1950’s. Rather than being a firm, non-changing image of a “man” when traditional manhood is faltering, in North by Northwest, he portrays exactly what society is fearful of – and resolves his instable position at the end by proposing to Eva Kendall.


How is it that two men, both overwhelmingly popular in the 50s, stand for two very different images of “ideal manhood?” It is possible that the answer lies in the genre that each one occupies. As Andrew Britton writes, “Popular American movies presuppose an enormously sophisticated intimacy with the conventions of genre – an intense awareness of the logic of this dramatic world as distinct from that one.” The rules and conventions of the Western dictate that John Wayne’s character does not have any shortcomings that he must overcome: the Western hero is an unwavering, unchanging man who can overcome all obstacles. In Stagecoach, Wayne’s Ringo knows exactly what he wants, and the only thing stopping him from his goals are his captors and the Indians. From the first moment he sees Louise, he knows he wants to marry her. The suspense thriller, however, is all about the unstable – after all, to create suspense, there must be insecurity and instability. Cary Grant’s character in North by Northwest, then, embodies and mirrors the greater instabilities of the movie by channeling the anxiety towards the image of a “man” and by donning many masks (and, like the way in which a suspense thriller is often set up, he sheds his masks one at a time throughout the course of the movie). The enemies in a suspense thriller are not clear-cut like those of the Western. Who, then, does the hero of the movie have to fight and prevail against? The end, of course, resolves all tensions about masculinity: Roger saves Eva from a precarious situation and proposes.


Questions:
1) John Wayne has remained in the top 10 list of favorite stars decades after his death. Why was this not the same for Grant? What does this say about American ideology?
2) While Wayne’s roles were almost exclusively set in the Western genre, Grant moved more between genres. How is star image affected by the respective decisions of these men?
3) Who are relevant stars today that harken the “manly” images of either Wayne or Grant? How do the more modern male stars reflect the challenges of present-day society?

1 comment:

Marvin Arias said...

Supplemental Post #1

As it is mentioned in the Prologue of "The Most Dangerous Man," John Wayne is considered a top American actor. He has topped lists for years. Although he is famously known for his representation of American values, one of the traits that probably aids his popularity is his body language. Because he is an actor in MOTION pictures, performance and movement is important. Willis goes on to mention is his prologue that Wayne although not a small man, had control of his large body, which allowed him to create "an entire Western language of body signals" (Willis 19). Even looking on John Wayne's Facebook Fan Page, it is said that John Wayne "is famous for his distinctive voice, walk and enormous physical presence" (http://www.facebook.com/pages/John-Wayne/8736848321?ref=search&sid=1044810023.743446434..1#!/pages/John-Wayne/8736848321?v=info&ref=search).

If we are then to look at Cary Grant, another American hero of the 1950s, there really isn't anything physical of performance based that makes him stand out. Yes, he portrays the ideology of the weaken man of the post-war era, but other than that, the audience does not have anything visual to remember him by. Film is a visual art form, and therefore, in order to be memorable there has to be something visual to trigger the memory to remember it. Sure, Grant had great performances, but nothing reoccurent like Wayne.

Looking at the constructed persona of Wayne on the screen, he has many physical motifs that follow him from movie to movie. Some of these are evident in Stagecoach. For instance, in the climactic scene at the end, when they face off with the Native Americans, Wayne although a guy with a big frame, is graceful enough to jump on a horse from the out-of-conrol carriage to steer the horses in the right direction without falling off.

Marvin Arias